| Absolute aggregate sum of UFs for the Core |
Figure 56 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E and Vulcanus data |
| Absolute sum of net ID nominations |
Figure 26 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E data |
| Average MACZT on network elements where the minimum 70% target was not met |
Figure 52 |
ACER calculations based on TSOs data |
| Average absolute Unscheduled Allocated Flows and Loop Flows in Continental Europe |
Figure 60 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E and Vulcanus data |
| Average annual DA electricity prices |
Figure 11 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E data |
| Average bid-ask spreads of OTC yearly products |
Figure 37 |
ICIS |
| Average oriented LFs in Continental Europe |
Figure 59 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E and Vulcanus data |
| Average oriented UAFs in Continental Europe |
Figure 58 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E and Vulcanus data |
| Average oriented UFs in Continental Europe |
Figure 57 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E and Vulcanus data |
| Average prices of balancing capacity (upward and downward capacity from aFRRs) |
Figure 28 |
ACER calculations based on NRAs data |
| Capacity factors coal and gas-fired power plants |
Figure 05 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E data |
| Capacity mechanisms in Europe |
Figure 41 |
NRAs |
| Capacity remunerated through CMs |
Figure 45 |
ACER calculations based on data from NRAs |
| Change in generation technologies |
Figure 03 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E data |
| Changes in tradable capacity (NTC) |
Figure 17 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E, NRAs and Nord Pool data |
| Churn factors in major European DA markets |
Figure 38 |
Volumes from European Power Trading 2021 report, Prospex Research Ltd and demand from ENTSO-E Transparency Platform and Eurostat |
| Churn factors in major European forward markets |
Figure 34 |
Volumes from European Power Trading 2021 report, © Prospex Research Ltd and NRAs, and demand from the ENTSO-E Transparency Platform and Eurostat |
| Costs incurred or forecast to finance CMs |
Figure 42 |
ACER calculations based on NRAs data |
| Costs incurred or forecast to finance CMs per unit demand |
Figure 44 |
ACER calculations based on NRA and ENTSO-E data |
| DA negative prices |
Figure 14 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E data |
| DA price convergence |
Figure 15 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E data |
| DA price spikes across Europe |
Figure 13 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E and PLATTS data |
| EU balancing energy activated cross-border and EU balancing capacity contracted |
Figure 32 |
ACER calculations based on NRAs data |
| Evolution of annual DA electricity prices |
Figure 12 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E data |
| Evolution of generation from RES |
Figure 02 |
ENTSO-E Transparency platform |
| Evolution of installed capacity for renewable and conventional |
Figure 04 |
ACER calculations based on TSOs data |
| Forward markets churn factor per type of trade |
Figure 35 |
European Power Trading 2021 report, © Prospex Research Ltd. and NRAs, and demand from the ENTSO-E Transparency Platform and Eurostat |
| Greenhouse gas emission intensity of electricity generation |
Figure 07 |
EEA |
| Growth in the total number of EVs and charging points in the EU |
Figure 10 |
European Alternative Fuels Observatory (EAFO). |
| Imbalance netting as a percentage of the total need for balancing energy |
Figure 33 |
ACER calculations based on NRAs data |
| Interruptibility schemes in Europe |
Figure 47 |
ACER based on information provided by the NRAs and, in case of France, publicly available information |
| Level of efficiency in the use of interconnectors in Europe in the different timeframes |
Figure ii |
Calculations based on national regulatory authorities, ENTSO-E and Vulcanus data |
| Level of efficient use of cross-zonal capacity |
Figure 24 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E data |
| Long term contracted capacity and relevant costs |
Figure 46 |
ACER calculations based on data from NRAs |
| Maximum and minimum technical price limits |
Figure 50 |
ACER based on NRAs data |
| Monthly evolution of DA negative prices |
Figure 55 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E and PLATTS data |
| Monthly evolution of DA price spikes |
Figure 54 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E and PLATTS data |
| NCT averages of both directions on cross-zonal borders |
Figure 16 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E data |
| Number of Interruptibility Schemes activations |
Figure 49 |
ACER based on data from NRAs |
| Overall costs of balancing (capacity and energy) over national electricity demand |
Figure 29 |
ACER calculations based on NRAs data and ENTSO-E data |
| Percentage of Capacity of Demand Side Response, RES generation and energy storage remunerated through CMs |
Figure 53 |
ACER calculations based on NRAs data |
| Realised and forecast costs of the Interruptibility schemes |
Figure 48 |
ACER based on NRA data |
| Repartition of procurement lead time of each country, for all types of reserve |
Figure 31 |
ACER calculations based on NRAs data |
| Repartition of the procurement lead time of each type of reserve in selected European markets (%) |
Figure 30 |
ACER calculations based on NRAs data |
| Share of electric passenger cars |
Figure 09 |
European Alternative Fuels Observatory (EAFO) |
| Share of hours when the minimum 70% target was not met |
Figure 51 |
ACER calculations based on TSOs data |
| Share of yearly traded volumes of selected European forward markets by product type |
Figure 36 |
European Power Trading 2021 report, © Prospex Research Ltd |
| Unit cost of Capacity Mechanisms |
Figure 43 |
ACER calculations based on NRA data |
| Weighted average prices of balancing energy activated from aFRRs |
Figure 27 |
ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E data |
| Year-on-year change in demand |
Figure 01 |
ACER Calculations based on Eurostat data, completed with data by the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E) – Transparency platform |
| Yearly ID churn factors in major European markets by type of trade |
Figure 39 |
Volumes from nominated electricity market operators (NEMOs) and demand from ENTSO-E Transparency Platform |