| BE>DE | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 1% |
| BE>DE | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 98% |
| BE>DE | Both bidding zones are simultaneously below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| BE>DE | No or insufficient data provided | 0% |
| DE>BE | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 1% |
| DE>BE | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 98% |
| DE>BE | Both bidding zones are simultaneously below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| DE>BE | No or insufficient data provided | 0% |
| DE>DK2 | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 99% |
| DE>DK2 | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 1% |
| DE>NO2 | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 1% |
| DE>NO2 | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 31% |
| DE>NO2 | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 67% |
| DE>NO2 | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| DE>NO2 | No or insufficient data provided | 0% |
| DE>NO2 | No or insufficient data provided | 0% |
| DE>SE4 | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 2% |
| DE>SE4 | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 50% |
| DE>SE4 | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 48% |
| DE>SE4 | No or insufficient data provided | 0% |
| DK1>DK2 | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 1% |
| DK1>DK2 | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 98% |
| DK1>DK2 | Both bidding zones are simultaneously below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| DK1>DK2 | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 1% |
| DK1>NL | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 9% |
| DK1>NL | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 90% |
| DK1>NL | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| DK1>NO2 | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 98% |
| DK1>NO2 | Both bidding zones are simultaneously below the minimum 70% target | 1% |
| DK1>NO2 | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 1% |
| DK1>SE3 | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 2% |
| DK1>SE3 | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 91% |
| DK1>SE3 | Both bidding zones are simultaneously below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| DK1>SE3 | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| DK1>SE3 | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 6% |
| DK2>DE | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 0% |
| DK2>DE | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 98% |
| DK2>DE | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 1% |
| DK2>DK1 | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 1% |
| DK2>DK1 | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 99% |
| DK2>DK1 | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| EE>FI | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 92% |
| EE>FI | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 8% |
| EE>FI | No or insufficient data provided | 0% |
| FI>EE | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 99% |
| FI>EE | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 1% |
| FI>EE | No or insufficient data provided | 0% |
| FI>SE3 | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 0% |
| FI>SE3 | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| FI>SE3 | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 99% |
| FI>SE3 | No or insufficient data provided | 0% |
| GR>IT | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 14% |
| GR>IT | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 84% |
| GR>IT | Both bidding zones are simultaneously below the minimum 70% target | 1% |
| GR>IT | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| GR>IT | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| GR>IT | No or insufficient data provided | 1% |
| IT>GR | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 14% |
| IT>GR | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 84% |
| IT>GR | Both bidding zones are simultaneously below the minimum 70% target | 1% |
| IT>GR | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| IT>GR | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| IT>GR | No or insufficient data provided | 1% |
| LT>PL* | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 2% |
| LT>PL* | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 44% |
| LT>PL* | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 55% |
| LT>SE4 | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 2% |
| LT>SE4 | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 95% |
| LT>SE4 | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 2% |
| LT>SE4 | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 1% |
| NL>DK1 | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 9% |
| NL>DK1 | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 90% |
| NL>DK1 | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| NL>NO2 | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 46% |
| NL>NO2 | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 54% |
| NL>NO2 | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| NO2>DE | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 1% |
| NO2>DE | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 49% |
| NO2>DE | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 49% |
| NO2>DE | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| NO2>DE | No or insufficient data provided | 0% |
| NO2>DE | No or insufficient data provided | 0% |
| NO2>DK1 | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 99% |
| NO2>DK1 | Both bidding zones are simultaneously below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| NO2>DK1 | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 1% |
| NO2>NL | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 46% |
| NO2>NL | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 54% |
| NO2>NL | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| PL*>LT | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 2% |
| PL*>LT | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 22% |
| PL*>LT | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 76% |
| PL*>SE4 | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 11% |
| PL*>SE4 | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 16% |
| PL*>SE4 | Both bidding zones are simultaneously below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| PL*>SE4 | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 72% |
| PL*>SE4 | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| SE3>DK1 | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 1% |
| SE3>DK1 | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 23% |
| SE3>DK1 | Both bidding zones are simultaneously below the minimum 70% target | 1% |
| SE3>DK1 | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 74% |
| SE3>FI | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 0% |
| SE3>FI | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 99% |
| SE3>FI | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| SE3>FI | No or insufficient data provided | 0% |
| SE4>DE | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 2% |
| SE4>DE | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 76% |
| SE4>DE | Both bidding zones are simultaneously below the minimum 70% target | 0% |
| SE4>DE | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 17% |
| SE4>DE | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 4% |
| SE4>DE | No or insufficient data provided | 0% |
| SE4>LT | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 2% |
| SE4>LT | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 92% |
| SE4>LT | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 2% |
| SE4>LT | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 4% |
| SE4>PL* | All interconnectors of the border were out of service | 11% |
| SE4>PL* | Both bidding zones of the border meet the minimum 70% target | 54% |
| SE4>PL* | Both bidding zones are simultaneously below the minimum 70% target | 1% |
| SE4>PL* | The first bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 31% |
| SE4>PL* | The second bidding zone (in alphabetical order)is below the minimum 70% target | 3% |