Market Integration

Data items

Name Reference Source Identifier
Average daily price as a function of the share of solar and wind generation in the EU, 2024 Figure 8 (left) ACER elaboration based on ENTSO-E transparency platform data
Average price spread per border, for the day-ahead and IDAs, Core CCR, 2024 since IDA go-live. (EUR/MWh Figure 25 ACER calculations based on data from the JAO Publication Tool.
Average solar and wind installed capacity in the EU, 2021-2024 (GW) Figure 8 (right) ACER elaboration based on ENTSO-E transparency platform data
Breakdown of spread for Core borders in 2024 after the IDA go-live, per product (%) Figure 24 ACER calculations based on JAO data
Breakdown of time to delivery for volumes traded in the continuous intraday market, EU-27, 2022-2024 (%) Figure 19 ACER calculations based on data from NEMOs.
Churn factors in a selection of European forward markets by type of OMP, 2020-2024 Figure 2 ACER calculations based on REMIT data
Comparison of average prices for balancing energy from aFRR before and after connection to Picasso for Belgium, France and the Netherlands – January 2024 – September 2025, (EUR/MWh) Figure 39 ACER calculation based on data from ELIA, RTE and TenneT Netherlands
Comparison of direction of price spreads between balancing capacity markets and day-ahead markets and comparison of the absolute prices spreads between markets, for cases where the direction of price spreads is not opposite, 2024 (%) Figure 42 ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E transparency platform data.
Correlation of wind speeds in selected areas of the EU and Norway Figure 12 (right) ACER elaboration based on Copernicus data – ERA5
Cost of procuring different volumes with ATC and flow-based allocation, Czechia, 23 January 2025 01:00-02:00 (EUR) Figure 29 ACER calculations based on data from the JAO Publication Tool.
Daily average wind speed, 2024 (m/s) Figure 12 (left) ACER elaboration based on Copernicus data – ERA5
Distribution of prices for activated balancing energy on Picasso, including both positive and negative balancing energy, 2024 Figure 32 ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E transparency platform data.
Evolution of intraday traded volumes in the continuous market by domestic versus cross-zonal trade, EU, 2021-2024 (TWh) Figure 18 ACER calculations based on data from NEMOs
Evolution of the PPA market: annual contracted capacity by renewable technology (GW) Figure 4 ACER calculations based on data from RE-Source
Evolution of traded volumes in intraday timeframe per product per month, EU (MWh). Figure 22 ACER calculations based on REMIT data.
Greek average aggregated demand and supply curves under different market conditions Figure 15 ACER
Greek day-ahead actual demand, actual supply, and counterfactual supply curves, 4 September 2024 at 20:00 – Extreme scenario Figure 16 ACER
Impact of renewable forecast errors on intraday prices, Germany, 2024, price spread (EUR), forecast error (%) Figure 21 ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E transparency platform data and data from NEMOs
Intraday Churn factors per country Figure 46 ACER calculations based on REMIT data and ENTSO-E Transparency Platform.
Net positions and prices for ATC (left) and flow-based (right) allocation, Core CCR, 23 January 2025 01:00-02:00, (MW and EUR) Figure 30 ACER calculations based on data from the JAO Publication Tool
Reduction in offered capacity of French nuclear power plants on 1 July 2025 (% and °C) Figure 11 (left) ACER elaboration based on ENTSO – E transparency platform data and Copernicus data – ERA5
Relative shares of traded volume for yearly products by delivery year in Germany, 2020-2024 (%) Figure 3 ACER calculations based on REMIT data
Share of optimisation cycles with price incidents before (1 January 2024 – 4 August 2024) and after the amendment, but before further TSOs joined (6 August – 10 October 2024) (%) Figure 34 ACER calculations based on TransnetBW data on Picasso
Share of optimisation cycles with price incidents before and after the amendment, January 2024-September 2025 (%) Figure 33 ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E transparency platform data
Share of optimisation cycles with price incidents in Czechia before and after Slovakia joined – 2024 (with Slovakia joining on 5 November 2024) (%) Figure 37 ACER calculations based on TransnetBW data on Picasso
Share of optimisation cycles with prices incidents 40 days before and after the introduction of elastic demand (on 9 August 2025) in Austria (%) Figure 36 ACER calculations based on TransnetBW data on PICASSO
Share of optimisation cycles with prices incidents for newly connected TSOs - 2024 (%) Figure 38 ACER calculations based on TransnetBW data on PICASSO
Share of price spread per border is <1 EUR/MWh, < 10 EUR/MWh or > 10 EUR/MWh – 2024 (%) Figure 44 ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E transparency platform data
Share of price spreads that are higher in the balancing capacity market than in day-ahead, vice versa or when they are the same per border for all cases where the price spread is not in opposite directions, 2024 (%) Figure 43 ACER calculations based on ENTSO-E transparency platform data
Share of volume traded in auctions and in continuous trading in the EU by Member State, 2024 since IDA go-live. (%) Figure 23 ACER calculations based on REMIT data
Temperature–demand relationship in Europe and selected Member States, 2024 (MW per °C) Figure 10 ACER elaboration based on ENTSO – E transparency platform data and Copernicus data – ERA5
Volume-weighted average prices in pan-European IDAs and the continuous market, EU, 2024 (EUR/MWh) Figure 26 ACER calculations based on REMIT data
Yearly churn factors in intraday markets by type of trade, EU, 2021-2024 Figure 17 ACER calculations based on REMIT and ENTSO-E Transparency Platform data