Adequacy concerns identified in NRAAs for different timeframes |
Figure 6 |
ACER based on data provided by NRAs |
|
Comparison of reported VOLLs with a benchmark based on macroeconomic data |
Figure 3 |
Presentation slides for the ACER webinar on implementation of the EU methodology for electricity adequacy metrics |
|
Costs to finance capacity mechanisms per unit demand as a percentage of the annual average DA price - 2022-2023 (%) |
Figure 9 |
ACER calculations based on NRA, ENTSO-E and EUROSTAT data |
|
Incurred and projected costs of capacity mechanisms in the EU – 2020-2024 (million euros) |
Figure 8 |
ACER calculations based on data provided by NRAs |
|
Incurred and projected costs to finance capacity mechanisms and per Member State for market-wide capacity mechanisms (left) and strategic reserves (right) — 2020–2024 (million euros) |
Figure 15 |
ACER calculations based on data provided by NRAs |
|
Ranges of the carbon dioxide emission of gas, hard coal and lignite-fired power plants per generated volume |
Figure 16 |
ACER based on Ember, European Electricity Review 2024 |
|
Status of capacity mechanisms in the EU — 2023 |
Figure 7 |
ACER based on data provided by NRAs |
|
Status of support schemes for non-fossil flexible resources |
Figure 12 |
ACER based on data provided by NRAs |
|
Total capacity remunerated in EU capacity mechanisms, per type of technology — 2020–2024 (GW) |
Figure 10 |
ACER calculations based on data provided by the NRAs and the ENTSO-E Transparency Platform |
|
Total payments and capacities awarded long-term contracts under market-wide capacity mechanisms by technology |
Figure 13 |
ACER calculations based on data from NRAs |
|
VOLL depending on the approach to assessing it |
Figure 5 |
Pre-reading material for the ACER webinar on implementation of the EU methodology for electricity adequacy metrics |
|
Variation in the VOLL in Member States |
Figure 2 |
Presentation slides for the ACER webinar on implementation of the EU methodology for electricity adequacy metrics |
|