Data items

Name Source
Figure 02 - Evolution of annual DA electricity prices in a selection of European markets ENTSO-E (2018)
Figure 03 - Frequency of price spikes in the main wholesale DA markets in Europe ENTSO-E and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 04 - DA price convergence in Europe by CCR (ranked) ā€“ 2008ā€“2017 (% of hours) ENTSO-E and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 05 - Monthly DA prices and frequency of full price convergence in the Baltic region ENTSO-E and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 06 - Monthly DA prices and frequency of full price convergence in the CWE region ENTSO-E and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 07 - Monthly DA prices and frequency of full price convergence in the SWE region ENTSO-E and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 08: NTC averages of both directions on cross-zonal borders, aggregated per CCR ENTSO-E, National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs), Nord Pool and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 09 - Changes in tradable capacities (NTC) in Europe ENTSO-E, NRAs, Nord Pool, 50 Hertz (for Polish profiles) and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 10 - Monthly average FB volumes in the economic directions in the Core region Data provided by the Core (CWE) TSOs to ENTSO-E and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 11 - Ratio of available tradable capacity to benchmark capacity on HVAC borders per Capacity Calculation Region NRAs, Nord Pool, ENTSO-Eā€™s CGM (2017) and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 12 - Regional performance based on the fulfilment of capacity calculation requirements NRAs, ENTSO-E, Nordpool Spot and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 14 - Unweighted share of active constraints (left) and share of constraints weighted with shadow prices (right) constraining the Core CWE Data provided by Core (CWE) TSOs to ENTSO-E and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 15 - Weighted-average RAM (as % of Fmax) for cross-zonal exchanges in internal-to-bidding-zone CNEs per TSO control area in 2017 Data provided by Core (CWE) TSOs to ENTSO-E and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 16 - Monthly average FB volumes in the economic directions in Core (CWE) Data provided by Core (CWE) TSOs to ENTSO-E and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 21 - Average bid-ask spreads in European forward markets ICIS (2018)
Figure 23 - Ratio between ID-traded volumes and electricity demand in the largest European ID markets NEMOs, Eurostat, CEER National Indicators Database and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 24 - ID-traded volumes per product, per bidding zone, in the largest European markets NEMOs and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 25 - Share of total ID-traded volumes according to intra-zonal vs. cross-zonal nature of trades in Europe NEMOs and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 26 - Share of total ID-traded volume per type of trading method, per nature of trade, per bidding zone in Europe NEMOs and ACER calculation (2018)
Figure 27 - Distribution of total ID-traded volumes for continuous trading and auctions per trading hour (CET), per trading method and per NEMO in Europe NEMOs and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 28 - Distribution of total ID-traded volumes for continuous trading per hour (CET) in Europe ā€“ 2017 NEMOs and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 29 - Distribution of ID-traded volumes per trading hour for the hourly product traded continuously in Denmark East NEMOs and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 30 - ID-traded volumes per auction round (GCT) in all European markets with auctions NEMOs and ACER calculation (2018)
Figure 31 - Distribution of volume per trading hour for the quarter-hourly product (auctions + continuous trading) in Germany NEMOs and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 32 - Share of ID-traded volumes per relative trading hour for hourly, half-hourly and quarter-hourly products in implicit continuous markets NEMOs and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 33 - Progress made in the efficient use of electricity interconnectors in the DA market timeframe over the last 8 years ENTSO-E, Vulcanus, Nord Pool and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 34 - Estimated social welfare gains still to be obtained from further extending DA market coupling per border ENTSO-E, NRAs, Vulcanus and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 35 - Absolute sum of net ID nominations for a selection of EU borders ENTSO-E, NRAs, Vulcanus and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 36: Level of utilisation of cross-zonal capacity in the ID timeframe when it has a value, for a selection of borders ENTSO-E, NRAs, Vulcanus and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 37 - Average prices of balancing capacity (from FCRs) in the markets involved in the FCR cooperation project NRAs and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 38 - Overall costs of balancing (capacity and energy) over national electricity demand in a selection of European markets NRAs and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 39 - EU balancing energy activated cross-border as a percentage of the amount of total balancing energy activated to meet national needs NRAs and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 40 - EU balancing capacity contracted cross-border as a percentage of the system requirements of reserve capacity (upward FCRs) NRAs and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 41 - Imbalance netting as a percentage of the total need for balancing energy (explicitly activated or avoided by means of netting) from all types of reserves in national balancing markets NRAs and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 43 - Costs incurred or envisaged to finance CMs, per unit demand and expressed as a percentage of DA prices in Europe, NRAs and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 44: Share of total ID-traded volume per trading method, per nature of trade (intra-zonal vs. cross-zonal), per NEMO NRAs and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 45 - Percentage of hours with net DA nominations against price differentials per border (ranked) ENTSO-E, NRAs, Vulcanus and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 46 - Weighted average prices of balancing energy activated from aFRRs (upward and downward activation) in a selection of EU markets ENTSO-E, NRAs, Vulcanus and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 47 - Average prices of balancing capacity (upward and downward capacity from aFRRs) in a selection of EU markets NRAs and ACER calculations (2018)
Figure 48: Absolute aggregate sum of UFs for four CCRs Vulcanus and ACER calculations (2018)